Monday, September 15, 2014

Discussion Rubrics for REL 2011 and REL 3308 classes - will be adopted in spring 2015 by all online 2011 & 3308 sections


REL 3308 Discussion Rubric based on 100 points

OVERALL QUALITY OF POST--

Overall Quality of Post
 25 (25%) points
 17.5 (17.5%) points
 7.5 (7.5%) points
 0 (0%) points

CRITICAL ANALYSIS--

Critical Analysis
 25 (25%) points
 17.5 (17.5%) points
 7.5 (7.5%) points
 0 (0%) points

RELEVANCE OF POST--

Relevance of Post
 25 (25%) points
 17.5 (17.5%) points
 7.5 (7.5%) points
 0 (0%) points

CONTRIBUTION TO THE OVERALL DISCUSSION--

Contribution to the Overall Discussion
 25 (25%) points
 17.5 (17.5%) points
 7.5 (7.5%) points
 0 (0%) points
Raw Total: 0.00 (of 100.0)
 

DISCUSSION RUBRIC FOR REL 2011 BASED ON 10 POINTS
POINTS
10
7
3
0

Overall Quality of Post - 25%
Original post is of a high quality, using evidence from the readings, class and other sources to establish a dialogue with classmates. 
Original post is of good quality, using some evidence from readings, class, and other sources.
Responds with minimum effort. Posts show a very basic level of understanding.
No posting.

Critical Analysis - 25%
Post expresses thoughtful analysis of the topic and the student clearly understands the materials covered by the discussion. 
Post expresses a general understanding of the material, but the student cannot apply the ideas to other relevant concepts.
Post reiterates the materials give in class and readings, but does not illustrate that the student has a good grasp of the ideas or can use them in an applied manner. 
No posting.


Relevance of Post- 25%
Posts topics related to discussion topic; prompts further discussion of topic.
Posts topics that are related to discussion content. 
Posts topics which do not relate to the discussion content; makes short or irrelevant remarks.
No posting.

Contribution to the Overall Discussion- 25%
Actively engages with the community, seeking to enhance the class and motivate others by thought provoking and creative perspectives.
Generally participates in the discussions, adding different perspectives on the topics. 
Does not make an effort to participate in the learning community as it develops.
No feedback provided to fellow student.​

No comments:

Post a Comment